Spend and margin analysis
Leverage map
Separates addressable spend from what is not, and ranks categories by leverage-to-spend ratio rather than size.
The largest category is not the most addressable: MRO is 8% of spend and holds 11.3% of leverage.
Outsourced procurement for manufacturing SMEs
Optybay brings senior capability inside your processes: spend analysis, tenders, suppliers, orders and supply chain. Running in weeks, without building a department first.
When OptyBay is needed
The owner approves orders in the evening because there is no structure.
A single buyer handles admin, negotiation and emergencies.
Delays surface only when the material should already have arrived.
Spend grows, but nobody can explain where the margin is going.
These are not isolated problems. They are what happens when procurement grows more slowly than the company.
Your supplier has already classified you. The question is which box — and what it takes to move.
If you are a marginal account, negotiating harder will not win concessions: you do not carry enough weight to be heard. Everything else follows from that — aggregating volume, qualifying alternatives, choosing where it is worth mattering.
What changes when procurement is actually run
less chaosin procurement.
One order book, kept current. Who owns what, with what response times, in writing.
Written operating rules, not good intentionsmore controlover process.
Delays surface before material runs out. Negotiation stops depending on urgency.
Delivery and service-level KPIs, reviewed with the boardmore marginfor the company.
Saving is measured against the baseline agreed at the start, not estimated afterwards.
3–8% typical on addressable spendServices
Problem
Spend is unreadable: nobody knows which categories weigh most, where supplier risk concentrates, which increases went through unchallenged.
We take on
Reconciliation of spend data, segmentation by category and supplier, identification of negotiating leverage.
Output
Board-level spend report, risks ranked by impact, and a 30/60/90-day action plan.
Problem
Admin absorbs everything. Negotiation and delivery control slip, and the board has no current picture.
We take on
RFQs, comparison, orders, expediting, negotiation, KPIs and board reporting.
Output
Procurement run on dedicated days, a current order book, and periodic board reporting.
Problem
Few qualified alternatives: when a supplier raises prices there is no leverage, and no time to build it.
We take on
Scouting, qualification, total-cost comparison, negotiation and measurement of saving.
Output
A qualified supplier panel, total-cost comparison, and saving measured against the agreed baseline.
Problem
Delays surface too late, and manual work on files and chasing consumes the hours needed to negotiate.
We take on
Order control, delays, critical materials, dashboards and automation where it genuinely cuts manual work.
Output
A current critical-order list, delay alerts, and KPI dashboards on delivery and service level.
What you receive
Anonymised examples with illustrative data. The format is what we hand to the board.
Spend and margin analysis
Separates addressable spend from what is not, and ranks categories by leverage-to-spend ratio rather than size.
The largest category is not the most addressable: MRO is 8% of spend and holds 11.3% of leverage.
Tenders, suppliers and negotiation
Total cost of ownership, not price: payment terms, lead time and defect rates monetised, with a recommended volume allocation.
The cheapest supplier is the most expensive of the three. The recommended one lacks capacity for the full volume, so the allocation is split.
Tenders, suppliers and negotiation
What the part ought to cost, rebuilt from BOM, cycle time and material quotes. Quotes are not compared with each other, but with reality.
The price contains €6.40 with no technical explanation. The question to the supplier is not a discount: it is where that sits.
Outsourced procurement office
Delay measured in days of remaining coverage and in cost of line stoppage, with a written escalation ladder.
Twenty days late on a part with sixty days of stock is not a problem.
Supply chain operations and AI
What poor service costs, which suppliers cause it, and which decision the board needs to take.
Three suppliers out of two hundred and fourteen drive 68% of the cost of poor service.
How we engage
A picture of spend, risks and priorities. It ends in a decision: continue, stop, or hand it to an internal team.
One tender, one category, one critical issue. The result is compared with the baseline agreed at the start, not with a later estimate.
The procurement office runs from outside on a standing basis. The scope is written: what we do, what stays with you.
We are not the right choice below €500,000 of addressable spend, or when you need an opinion rather than coverage. We say so at the first conversation.
Method
ERP extracts, orders, price lists and delivery dates, normalised by category and supplier.
DeliverableA reconciled spend and supplier dataset.
What must be fixed this month, what can stop production, what is worth negotiating.
DeliverableA 30/60/90 priority list with estimated impact.
Who owns which categories, how urgent cases are handled, with what response times to suppliers.
DeliverableOperating rules and defined ownership, in writing.
Tenders, renegotiation, qualification of alternatives, recovery of late deliveries.
DeliverableQuote comparisons, signed agreements, recovery plan.
Compared with the baseline agreed at the start, with no later adjustments.
DeliverableKPI dashboard and periodic board review.
The markets we work in
Categories change, the method does not: analysis, tenders, negotiation, coverage. Vertical seniority matters where buying is technical.
Components, machining, fabrication, raw materials: where saving is most measurable.
Machinery, automation, MRO, utilities: technical buying that demands seniority.
Fit-out, furniture, recurring supplies and specifications for multi-site rollouts.
Subcontracts, materials, plant hire: tenders and comparisons to keep sites on budget.
Qualified suppliers, compliance and continuity of supply in regulated environments.
Raw materials, primary and secondary packaging, co-packing: continuity of supply with costs under control.
We also work as a technical partner to accountancy firms, fractional CFOs and interim managers looking to bring cost value to their clients.
AI
Process first, tool second.
Only where it saves measurable time.
No platform to buy or maintain.
Operational uses
AI prepares the data. Decision, negotiation and accountability stay human. How we use it, on which data and within which limits is set out on our transparency page.
Cases
About us
OptyBay is the procurement office for manufacturing SMEs that do not need to build one internally. Based in Milan, we work inside your processes, with your data and your suppliers. Coverage is direct: whoever analyses the spend is the same person who negotiates with suppliers and answers to the board.
We do not sell recommendations, slides or software licences. We do the work: RFQs, negotiation, orders, expediting. What stays with the company is a working process, not a document.
What we are
A procurement office that works from outside. Not consultants, not a software platform.
Who we work for
Italian manufacturing SMEs, typically between €5m and €100m in revenue.
Where we operate
Based in Milan, projects across Italy, on site and remotely.
How you pay us
Project fee, monthly retainer, or a share of measured saving. Agreed before we start.
Frequently asked
No. A consultant analyses and hands over recommendations; we take on the operational work. We issue RFQs, run negotiations, follow orders and expediting, and report KPIs to the board. The scope is written down: what we do, what stays with you. If you want an opinion there are cheaper options; if you need procurement actually run, that is our trade.
When spend volume justifies a structured function but not a full headcount, or when you need expertise in technical categories that does not exist in-house.
An outsourced procurement office brings senior capability immediately, without fixed hiring costs. If an internal role is the right answer, we support the search, selection and role definition for buyers and procurement managers.
RFQs, comparisons, orders, expediting, negotiation and board reporting. The scope is written: what we do, what stays with you.
Yes: scouting qualified alternative suppliers, quote comparison, dual sourcing on critical components, and negotiation led by senior people.
Against a baseline set at the start: prices, delays and service level. The comparison is made on that, not on later estimates.
For reading and comparing quotes, spend analysis, price list comparison, delay alerts and KPI dashboards. AI prepares the data; decision, negotiation and accountability stay human. No platform to buy or maintain.
The model depends on scope: project fee, monthly retainer on dedicated days, or a share of measured saving. It is agreed before starting, never once work is under way.
The more useful test is different: below €500,000 of addressable spend the return rarely justifies the work, and we say so at the first conversation. Above that threshold the cost of coverage is typically a fraction of the saving it generates, and that is the comparison to make — not the absolute price.
The assessment takes roughly 2–4 weeks; the first results from tenders and renegotiation usually come within 2–3 months.
Contact
Tell us how procurement and suppliers are organised today. Together we will work out whether you need an assessment, a targeted project, or ongoing coverage.
Office
Milan